Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Picnic engine produces 17 HP more power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Toyota Carina E. Thanks to more power Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.41 m | |
| Toyota Picnic and Toyota Carina E are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Carina E has more luggage space. Toyota Picnic has 290 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Toyota Picnic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |