Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Seat Alhambra 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 19.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Picnic and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, but Toyota Picnic torque is 3 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.7 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 365 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |