Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Renault Espace 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
| Toyota Picnic engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Espace, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Renault Espace. Despite less power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that by driving the Toyota Picnic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.77 m | |
| Toyota Picnic is 1 cm longer than the Renault Espace, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 6 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 2850 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Espace (by 1010 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Espace, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Espace has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Renault Espace has
| |