Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Nissan Serena 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 60 HP less power than Nissan Serena, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Nissan Serena. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.8 | |
| Toyota Picnic consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Serena, which means that by driving the Toyota Picnic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is larger, but lower. Toyota Picnic is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Serena, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Picnic is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Picnic has 340 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Serena. This could mean that the Toyota Picnic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Nissan Serena has
| |