Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Nissan Serena 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Picnic engine produces 55 HP less power than Nissan Serena, but torque is 19 NM more than Nissan Serena. Despite less power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is larger, but lower. Toyota Picnic is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Serena, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Picnic is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Picnic has 340 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Serena. This could mean that the Toyota Picnic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Nissan Serena has
| |