Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Toyota Carina E 1994
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 47 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.8 | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Picnic consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | Used also on Toyota Celica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.41 m | |
| Toyota Picnic and Toyota Carina E are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Toyota Picnic has 290 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 590 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |