Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Nissan Serena 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Toyota Picnic engine produces 17 HP less power than Nissan Serena, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Nissan Serena. Despite less power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.3 | |
|
The Nissan Serena is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Picnic consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Serena, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Serena gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Primera, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Picnic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is larger, but lower. Toyota Picnic is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Serena, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Picnic is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Picnic has 340 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Serena. This could mean that the Toyota Picnic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Nissan Serena has
| |