Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Honda Stream 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 28 HP less power than Honda Stream, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Honda Stream. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
| By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Picnic is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Stream, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Picnic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 6 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1520 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 320 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Honda Stream has
| |