Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 240 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.41 m | |
| Toyota Picnic and Toyota Carina E are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Toyota Picnic has 290 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 590 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Toyota Picnic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |