Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Picnic is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 128 HP | 90 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 205 NM | 170 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 11.8 - 19.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.5 | 6.5 - 13.6 | |
|
Toyota Picnic petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Toyota Picnic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 9 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`007 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |