Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Toyota Sienna 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Toyota Picnic is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Sienna is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 128 HP | 187 - 266 HP | |
Torque: | 178 - 205 NM | 252 - 392 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.5 | 11.2 - 13.1 | |
Toyota Picnic petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Sienna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 56 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 29 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 993 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 3810 litres | |
Toyota Sienna has more luggage space. Toyota Picnic has 813 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 1970 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Sienna, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`007 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 19 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |