Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Toyota Sienna 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Picnic is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Sienna is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 128 HP | 197 - 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 205 NM | 284 - 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 9.4 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.5 | 9.5 - 9.6 | |
|
Toyota Picnic petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Sienna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 39 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 4050 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage space. Toyota Picnic has 575 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 2210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`007 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |