Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Toyota Previa 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 128 HP | 116 - 156 HP | |
Torque: | 178 - 205 NM | 225 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 11 - 13.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.5 | 7.2 - 10.8 | |
Toyota Picnic petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Previa. On average, Toyota Picnic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.78 m | |
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 25 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 16 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 2370 litres | |
Toyota Previa has more luggage space. Toyota Picnic has 315 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Previa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Previa (by 530 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`007 | ~ 2`227 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |