Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 128 HP | 73 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 205 NM | 132 - 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.5 | 5.8 - 8.5 | |
|
Toyota Picnic petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Toyota Picnic equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.41 m | |
| Toyota Picnic and Toyota Carina E are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Toyota Picnic has 290 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 590 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`007 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |