Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Opel Zafira 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Toyota Picnic
1996 - 2001
Opel Zafira
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.21.6 - 2.2


Power: 90 - 128 HP82 - 192 HP
Torque: 178 - 205 NM150 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 - 13.9 seconds8.2 - 17 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.7 - 9.56.6 - 10.1
Toyota Picnic petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Zafira. On average, Toyota Picnic equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 4.53 m4.32 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.62 m1.63 m
Toyota Picnic is 21 cm longer than the Opel Zafira, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 180 litres145 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1840 litres1705 litres
Toyota Picnic has more luggage capacity.
Toyota Picnic has 35 litres more trunk space than the Opel Zafira. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 135 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Zafira, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`007~ 2`035

below average
Average price (€): 20001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Toyota Picnic has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Opel Zafira has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: