Toyota Paseo 1996 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Paseo engine produces 53 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Toyota Paseo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Toyota Paseo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Paseo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Toyota Paseo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Toyota Paseo is smaller. Toyota Paseo is 19 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Paseo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 278 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Paseo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`385 kg | 1`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Paseo has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |