Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 38 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 80 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 14.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 29 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 15 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 832 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 832 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1368 litres | 2050 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 682 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`060 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |