Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 54 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.6 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 34 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 13 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 832 litres | 1136 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1368 litres | 2254 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 304 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 886 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`060 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |