Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 53 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 14.7 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 34 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 17 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 832 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1368 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`060 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |