Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 vs Jeep Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 22 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 75 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.3 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1999 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 59 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 17 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 28 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 832 litres | 932 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1368 litres | 1954 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 100 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 586 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`060 | 2`223 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |