Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 45 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota 4-Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.81 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 832 litres | 1263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1368 litres | 2257 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 431 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 889 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`060 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |