Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1989

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
1995 - 1998
Land Rover Range Rover
1989 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 4.2 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 170 HP121 HP
Torque: 380 NM284 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds19.5 seconds
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive.
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 49 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.210.3
Real fuel consumption: 12.6 l/100km11.5 l/100km
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Fuel tank capacity: 95 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
750 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.48 m
Width: 1.93 m1.82 m
Height: 1.91 m1.81 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 36 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 832 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1368 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover.
Gross weight (kg): 3`0603`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 12 0009800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv