Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 vs Land Rover Discovery 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 57 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.6 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 36 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 832 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1368 litres | 1970 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 458 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 602 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`060 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |