Toyota Land Cruiser 1995 vs Jeep Wrangler 1987
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Wrangler) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 14 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, but torque is 90 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 15.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 96 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 25 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 832 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1368 litres | 1223 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 478 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 145 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`060 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |