Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 37 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 17.8 | 14.0 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 57 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 830 litres | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 2033 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 181 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 663 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`960 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |