Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.5 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 215 HP | 235 HP | |
Torque: | 373 NM | 434 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 engine produces 20 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser 1998. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 17.8 | 16.6 | |
The Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 96 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 is smaller. Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 830 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1992 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`960 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 12 000 | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |