Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 HP | 258 HP | |
Torque: | 434 NM | 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 23 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 9 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.6 | 16.5 | |
Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 28 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`495 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |