Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Nissan Patrol 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 434 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Nissan Patrol is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Patrol, but torque is 34 NM more than Nissan Patrol. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.6 | 18.2 | |
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 95 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 5.01 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 183 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 183 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2287 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |