Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 34 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 151 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.6 | 13.0 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 31 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 12 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1725 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Lexus RX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Lexus RX has
| |