Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Ford Explorer 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 HP | 212 HP | |
Torque: | 434 NM | 344 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 23 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Ford Explorer. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.6 | 13.0 | |
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Ford Explorer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 391 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`595 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |