Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Dodge Durango 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 HP | 236 HP | |
Torque: | 434 NM | 407 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 1 HP less power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 27 NM more than Dodge Durango. Despite less power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 8.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.6 | 16.8 | |
Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 95 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 4.91 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 12 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 532 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`903 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |