Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 45 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Chevrolet Blazer. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.6 | 14.3 | |
|
The Chevrolet Blazer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 25 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 20 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |