Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
1998 - 2002
Mitsubishi Pajero
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.2 Diesel3.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 204 HP165 HP
Torque: 430 NM373 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds13.8 seconds
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive.
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 39 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.610.5
Real fuel consumption: 14.1 l/100km10.4 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 315 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Fuel tank capacity: 96 litres90 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway1030 km on highway
680 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.89 m4.80 m
Width: 1.94 m1.88 m
Height: 1.88 m1.86 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5003`300
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 68003000
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv