Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 68 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.1 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 18 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |