Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs BMW X5 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 20 HP more power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 20 NM more than BMW X5. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.1 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm longer than the BMW X5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
BMW X5 has
| |