Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 158 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 126 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.4 | 16.0 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |