Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Dodge Durango 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 236 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 2 HP more power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Dodge Durango. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.4 | 16.8 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 12 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |