Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 430 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 34 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 10.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 13.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 11 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |