Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 6 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 13.1 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 28 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 10 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.6/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |