Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 engine produces 45 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser 2003, but torque is 50 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser 2003. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 13.6 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2003, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota 4-Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser 2003 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2003, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2003, which means Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.6/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |