Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 14 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 10 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.8 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |