Toyota Land Cruiser 2011 vs Mercedes GL 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 381 HP | 388 HP | |
Torque: | 543 NM | 530 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 7 HP less power than Mercedes GL, but torque is 13 NM more than Mercedes GL. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 13.9 | |
The Mercedes GL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GL, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
700 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Mercedes GL gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.97 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.95 m | 1.84 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm shorter than the Mercedes GL, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 620 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2300 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`299 | 2`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 20 800 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes GL has
| |