Toyota Land Cruiser 2011 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 55 HP more power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Jeep Commander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 15.5 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 590 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 16 cm longer than the Jeep Commander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`299 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |