Toyota Land Cruiser 2007 vs Mazda CX-9 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 288 HP | 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 25 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 106 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.4 | 12.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.73 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 701 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |