Toyota Land Cruiser 2007 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 615 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 80 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 175 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 13.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus LX | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 701 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space (by 88 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |