Toyota Land Cruiser 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 615 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 78 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus LX | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |