Toyota Land Cruiser 2007 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Commander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 303 HP | |
| Torque: | 615 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 68 HP less power than Jeep Commander, but torque is 170 NM more than Jeep Commander. Despite less power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 13.9 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus LX | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.92 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 16 cm longer than the Jeep Commander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |