Toyota Land Cruiser 2007 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 615 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 17 HP more power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Jeep Commander. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.8 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus LX | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 16 cm longer than the Jeep Commander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1940 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 489 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`300 kg | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |