Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Nissan Murano 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 318 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 368 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 64 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Nissan Murano. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 8.3 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 750 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus GS, Lexus GX, Toyota Tundra | Used also on Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Land Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 259 litres | 909 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1897 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 650 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |