Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 318 HP | 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 90 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 259 litres | 690 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 431 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`350 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 38 400 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |